|
RELIGION and CULTURES in HISTORY
Prepared for the University of California, San Diego
Teacher Guidelines for
TEACHING THE
CHRISTIAN/AMERICAN CULTURE
Sponsored by: The California History-Social Science Project at the University of California at San Diego, California
Program Director: Kim Plummer Facilitator for the California History-Social Science Project at the University of California at San Diego: the Co-Director of the UCSD Diversity Institute; a Facilitator for the California Three R's Project
A Unit in Multicultural Curriculum written by: Dr. Robert L. Simonds P.O. Box 3200 Costa, Mesa, CA 92628 (714) 251-9333
Note: These guidelines have not been copyrighted. Anyone may reproduce or adapt it in any way desired; adding or deleting as desired.
Teacher Guidelines for Teaching the Christian/American Culture
Outline
Introductory remarks A Model Policy for Teaching Multiculturalism and Diversity Part I: Teaching About Religion -- the U.S. Legal Guidelines Part II: The Christian Religion - History and Culture Section 1. The Christian Faith -- It's National Impact - "In God We Trust" - The Christian Culture in National Life - Economics - Labor - Money - Education - Education and Training -- A National Mandate - Six Biblical Purposes of Education Section 2. Jesus Christ -- The Central Figure of Christianity Section 3. The Biblical Principles of Religion Say Who God Is Section 4. Christianity and Mankind in the Christian Culture Section 5. The Christian Impact Upon Society Section 6. The Christian World View vs. The Secular World View Part III: Some Do's and Don'ts When Teaching Multiculturalism
Introductory Remarks The United States of America has a multitude of religions, each with a unique culture of its own. In many ways, the religions of America are a melting pot that affect all parts of our culture to some degree. America, however, has only one original, still dominate, religious culture. And that culture is overwhelmingly built upon Christianity. The Christian faith and its biblical principles, established in our Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, gave America and the world a completely new concept of government, one of allowing the church to be totally FREE of the dictates of the state (for the first time in history): in which the states (the body politic) were established for the protection of the free and independent church and its doctrine of "Christian Self-Government with Union." The Christian church was expected to raise up generations of men and women capable of maintaining the Constitutional principles of "self-government by union," the uniquely Christian and American ideal of civil government. The American nation has a Constitution, established upon the biblical "Ten Commandments." The Bill of Rights were taken directly from the Biblical principles of Christianity. The central figure of both the Bible and of all Christendom is Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ re-established morality in its utmost purity. Jesus gave mankind and every individual the principles and rules to live by, to help every person be more perfect and fulfilled. Christianity and its doctrines of love, service and liberty have long been established in America. Before Christianity had been applied to society, through civil government, the world only had government by autocracy (a single absolute ruler) as one extreme; and pure democracy (rule by the majority) at the opposite extreme. Both of these systems had major flaws. The influence of Christianity and the American forefather's belief in one God and Creator, established the first government in history as a REPUBLIC -- a democratic republic. This Christian form of government became known as the "golden mean" between autocracy (kings and dictators) and pure democracy (majoritarianism, without regard to minority views). Thus, Christianity, based upon the Bible, provided the basis for the first successful civil government that allows the civil rights of minorities, women's freedom, religious freedom for all religions, free speech, free press, and free elections. Most of those liberties came directly from the Bible and Christianity. The American culture is impregnated with the Christian culture of love, law, freedom, liberty and justice for all. The culture of a people is made up of their religious structures, intellectual and artistic manifestations and long-lived traditions. Therefore, "Cultural Relativity" refers to cultural traits with all their complexities which cannot be understood or evaluated without reference to the function in the broader culture as a whole. Prerequisite to "tolerance" and conciliation is an understanding of one another's culture. America is a pluralistic society with many beliefs (political, religious and social) that must co-exist and participate together in government and society in a civil and charitable manner for the Christian/American culture and all other cultures to survive. That prejudice and discrimination must be prevented through education and understanding, is a Christian doctrine, as well as a judicial mandate in American society. As a multicultural society we must be ever aware that America's culture is distinctly Christian. And because it is a Christian culture, all religious cultures are welcome and lovingly encouraged. With that liberty and freedom for all cultures, Americans (who include all cultures) have developed a "national culture" unique in all the world -- "The American Christian Culture." Every society has a dominant culture (some restrict that culture to just one), but America is a unique culture in that 76% of all Americans are Christians, with 235,000 Christian churches and 193,000,000 members. We are all, in fact, however, Americans!! Because America's laws and civil government are Christian based, all religious and non-religious cultures are given equal liberty and freedom. Only America offers this freedom to all mankind without judicial or governmental prejudice. Not that hateful prejudice does not exist, through individuals, for that is a never-ending blight to be monitored and disallowed in a free nation for all men and all beliefs.
A Model Policy for Teaching Multiculturalism and Diversity
Note: With various multicultural interests pressuring public schools for their own culture to be taught, many public schools have adopted a policy on Multiculturalism, as a guide to curriculum and teaching in this diverse and potentially divisive arena, as follows: Policy "This district recognizes that its students are growing up in a society composed of many races and persons who were raised in foreign cultures with different values. Also, America is a pluralistic society with people of various beliefs (political, religious, social, etc.) co-existing and participating in government and society. In an effort to prevent prejudice and discrimination from harming individuals and society, as they have in the past, this district is making an effort to foster appreciation of one another's uniqueness as well as an understanding of other viewpoints. The teaching staff and district personnel will work within the following guidelines to give appropriate attention to multiculturalism and diversity: (1) Instruction should be integrated into existing subject matter, in a logical and reasonable manner, as time allows. Inclusion in such classes as social studies, history, literature, language and geography is appropriate. (2) No staff member shall make derogatory remarks about any race, gender or religion, or discriminate against any student because of personal traits or beliefs. (3) It is recognized and regretted that gross injustices have occurred in American society, in the past, directed toward people of race, gender or belief. Students should be taught about such injustices in the hope they will learn from them and not allow them to continue. However, most students had nothing to do with that discrimination and they should not be made to feel guilty about it now. The past is the past. This district would like to move on toward a positive future. Making some student groups feel guilty and others feel they deserve compensation now for what happened to their ancestors will only further divide society and create more prejudice. (4) The district will offer no special treatment for students because of their race, gender, beliefs or personal behaviors. This would be a practice of reverse discrimination. (5) Teaching about various cultures will be appropriately proportionate to their representation in American society at large. American culture will be given dominant attention, since it is the American culture in which all the students live. (6) The district recognizes that cultures have distinctly different values, usually based upon religious beliefs. It is appropriate to teach about the culture and its beliefs and values. It is not acceptable to require students to participate in religious activities (i.e. an Indian ritual prayer dance or Eastern meditation), nor is it appropriate for teachers to denigrate or advocate any religion. (7) Since America is a `melting pot' of various cultures into an American culture with unity of purpose, values and respect for all the races, colors and creeds, traditional American values should be taught. Students should understand that this country was pioneered primarily by those seeking religious freedom. As our Bill of Rights states, we are all created equally, and hold equal rights under the law. America was born and developed upon the foundation of Judeo-Christian values. Commonalties should be emphasized, not differences. (8) While the district recognizes that we live in a globally-interrelated world that is made up of treaties, cooperative agreements, and economic ties, national sovereignty should be respected and emphasized in all instruction. (9) When teaching about culture, time constraints require that only main points and primary influences be covered. For example, important events in American history must be covered, even if only Anglos were present to participate. Small accomplishments should be given proper attention, as time allows. They should not become a primary focus solely because of the main participant's race. All events should be represented in proper proportion and relative importance so students do not receive a distorted or incomplete view of history. For example, it would be inappropriate to spend a two-week unit on the life and death of Marilyn Monroe and only one week on the Civil War; it would also be a disproportionate amount of time to study Martin Luther King, Jr. and his beliefs for a month while spending only a week on the American Revolution. (10) It is appropriate and beneficial to have guest speakers present their culture. However, "equal and proportionate time" should be practiced, in fairness, whenever potential controversy is involved. Guest speakers will not be allowed to recruit students to a belief or life-style. (11) Students should be expected to respect others' rights and humanity, even if they choose not to accept the person's beliefs, or find their beliefs distasteful. The student may wish to oppose a behavior (i.e. homosexuality, child molestation, murder) but accept the person. (12) Since beliefs and cultures may be sensitive subject areas to some extent, students' privacy will be respected in all discussions and activities. (13) Multicultural instruction should be academically strong, not ideologically based. It will support our nation's democratic, Western values and respect individual rights.
Part I - Teaching About Religion - The U.S. Legal Guidelines The Constitution is the basic legal guideline for civil government and its relation to religion and Christian culture. Yet, how courts may interpret this relationship, especially as it applies to the First Amendment of the Constitution, has become a legal and religious nightmare at times. A teacher must have a firm grasp on what is legal and what is not legal concerning religion in the classroom. To that end a review of the legal rights to teach religion from some of the court-established guidelines may be helpful.
Part II - The Christian Religion -
History and Culture
(The Bible, God, Jesus Christ, Old Testament and New Testament)
Section 2 - Jesus Christ -
The Central Figure of Christianity
The entirety of the Christian religion is based on the person of Jesus Christ. The word `Christian' was coined to describe the apostles and the disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ's followers -- "the Christians," or Christ-ians. Jesus Christ was both God and man -- it is a mystery and a miracle how Jesus could be born of the virgin Mary, who was without a husband relationship with a man. Jesus had no biological human father. God the Father and Creator sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to be born of a human mother, Mary, conceived by the Holy Spirit of God. (Matthew 1:20, K.J.V.) In God's desire to save mankind from the justice (death) for man's sin (Adam's) against God, He sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to be born of mankind (a human mother whose womb was impregnated, by the Holy Spirit (a miracle of God) with His Son Jesus. It is this doctrine of miraculous conception that the Bible simply states as a fact, and Christians accept by faith, based on many historical facts. We know who Jesus is by the early Christian church and the Roman historians that have thoroughly documented Jesus' birth, His life, His death and His resurrection from death to life. All these events are the most thoroughly documented facts in all of history. The Christian biblical teaching is that there is but ONE GOD, is the doctrine known as monotheism. Mono -- meaning one -- theism, (from the Greek word Theos, or God) -- meaning a belief in God. Thus we use the word "monotheism" to mean a belief in one God. However, Biblical monotheism (Christianity) is different than the monotheism of, say, Judaism or Islam (who also believe in one God). The God of the Bible is a Triune God -- meaning three persons in ONE God -- Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Furthermore, God is not only an everywhere present (omnipresent) Spirit, He has also been revealed in the person of His incarnate (embodied in a human form) Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. It is this Christian doctrine of the Trinity (yet only one God) and the doctrine of the God-man (Jesus Christ) that are unique and very fundamental doctrines and beliefs only found in the Christian religion. Jesus' birth was predicted precisely, over 750 years before His birth, by the Old Testament Jewish prophet, Isaiah (Isaiah 7:14, 11:1-5). Altogether, over 3000 prophecies of Jesus Christ, His birth, His teachings, death, resurrection and heavenly Kingship were accurately foretold in the Old Testament. Jesus is the only one in history that this can be said of. Jesus was described (in the Old Testament) as the Son of God; Divine Servant; Righteous King; Prince of Peace; Mighty God; Everlasting Father; Creator; Law-Giver; Burden-bearer; Sin-bearer; Intercessor; Only Savior. Jesus was also described with the characteristics of Sinlessness; Greatness; Victorious; Saving Power; Compassion; Meekness; Gentleness and Wisdom (to name a few) -- all found in the Old Testament book of Isaiah (not to mention the names given to Christ and His characteristics, clearly predicted in most all the other 38 Old Testament books). His Apostles, in the New Testament, described Jesus as the Kingly Messiah; The Wonder Worker; The Friend of Sinners and Outcasts; The Counselor; The Servant; The Giver of the Holy Spirit; The Light of the World; The Water of Life; The Bread of Life; The Good Shepherd -- plus many more descriptions that are portraits of the living, resurrected Christ. Jesus Christ was the only man to be able to raise men from the dead (and some already had been buried)! His miracles of healing are known by all men, even today. He healed the sick of any and all disease (including leprosy); he healed the blind; the lame; the deaf; the poor. He performed many miracles in the physical universe, such as cursing the fig tree, which shriveled up and died immediately. Jesus Christ was fully human, yet fully Divine -- thus known as the God-man. Jesus' teachings covered all areas of mankind's existence and his universe. He endorsed the Old Testament always. He also held up the Ten Commandments as God's laws for living that every man would be judged by, even though man's salvation is by `faith.' In Exodus 20:3-17 in the Bible's Old Testament, the Ten Commandments were given as follows (abbreviated form):
The Christian Cultural Influences of the Ten Commandments cannot be fully told nor ever comprehended--they are so vast and world-influencing. Upon God's Ten Commandments all American jurisprudence (law) was established. Today, the Ten Commandments are used to form the basis for ethical (standard of moral rightness) behavior around the world. In America, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were both formed directly from the Ten Commandments and other Bible teachings. The Old English Law for the British Empire was a result of a huge research project to search out every Biblical principle for government and society. The results showed they must change their form of monarchical kingship in government and form an entirely different legal system to govern society. Unfortunately, the Monarchy would not allow the form of government to change, but they did accept the new legal system and the Ten Commandments as the guide in all jurisprudence (legal structures). The legal system became known as the Old English Law System. It's value to America's founding fathers was that the new American Law system, which was heavily Old English Law, was just what the men seeking religious freedom in America were looking for -- a Biblical, God-given system of law and justice. Thus the American system of law derived from the Biblically-based governing Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which was taken directly from the Bible and had much in common with the Old English Law. This American Law system is revered the world over and its cultural affects have made America the greatest country in the world -- not only today -- but the greatest country and government ever devised. The cultural legacy of Christ's teachings is America. Justice, freedom and liberty have been a direct result of the Christian cultural foundation given by Jesus Christ. Jesus' birth started a new worldwide calendar. The Christian holidays of Christmas (Christ's birthday) and Easter (Christ's resurrection) illustrate Christ's impact on American and worldwide culture. Even His unbelieving enemies, Jesus Christ's worst critics call Him the world's greatest teacher; greatest thinker; greatest prophet; greatest religious leader, etc. The founder of the Christian religion, Jesus Christ, has just over one billion followers worldwide, as of 1997. In America alone He has 235,000 churches with 193,000,000 Christians (out of an American population of about 250 million people). About 80% of all Americans attend churches. The cultural impact of these numbers clarify America's long-time, commonly known fact -- America is, indeed, a Christian nation. Jesus Christ is therefore the foundation of all the afore-mentioned cultural and institutional indicators. That fact is an indication of the greatest cultural impact the world has ever known -- all by ONE MAN -- the Christian God and Savior of all mankind--Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is not merely the founder of a religion--Christianity--He is God, the actual CREATOR of all things. The Apostle John who sat under Jesus' teachings for three years, and observed the innumerable healing miracles said, "All things were made by Him; and without Him was not anything made that was made." (John 1:3, K,J,V.) "Eternal life is in Him, and this life gives light to all mankind" (John 1:4, L.B.). The "light to all mankind" indicates the worldwide cultural impact of Jesus Christ. Space would not permit or it could be listed in a huge book the documented proofs of Jesus' Deity, His miracles, His ministry, His appearance to large groups of people after His resurrection from the dead and His bodily ascension into heaven, in the presence of His disciples. "Then Jesus led them out along the road to Bethany, and lifting His hands to heaven, He blessed them, and began rising into the SKY, and went on to heaven" (Luke 24:50,51, L.B.).
Part II - The Christian Religion -
History and Culture
(The Bible, God, Jesus Christ, Old Testament and New Testament)
Section 3 - The Biblical Principles of
Religion Say Who God Is
The Biblical Principles of Religion. There are many religions in the world. Christianity says there is only one God and one inspired Word of God--the BIBLE. The Bible gives the only documented history of Creation and the human race. The Christian belief is solely based upon the Bible and it's revelation of Jesus Christ, mankind's savior from the results of the first created man's (Adam) sin.
Part II - The Christian Religion -
History and Culture
(The Bible, God, Jesus Christ, Old Testament and New Testament)
Section 4 - Christianity and Mankind
In the Christian Culture:
Who Is Man? Mankind was perfect before Adam's sin and man's subsequent fall from God's original plan. After Adam sinned against God's explicit command, man's nature changed (Genesis 3:9,10). His new sinful nature now desires to do whatever pleasures him; the evil desires his sin nature became after he sinned (broke God's law). (Gen. 2:16,17)Mankind inherited the sin nature of Adam and Eve (Romans 5:12). God, through His love for man, chose to provide forgiveness to man for his sins, through His miraculous manifestation of God's Son, Jesus Christ, who became a man (born of a virgin), yet remained God, without a human father (John 3:16; Ephesians 2:8; John 3:36). Jesus was both God (God was his father) and man (Mary was his mother). The Bible tells Christians that God is one in three persons -- God the Father; God the Son; God the Holy Spirit -- 3 in 1. This is referred to as the trinity. It is much like our own human father. My father was a man (himself); a husband (to mother); and a father to me -- three persons in one. Three functions, but one father. Christian culture and doctrine accept this mystery because God says it is so. The Christian culture and religion teaches, as the central doctrine of their Lord Jesus Christ's teachings: man must be born again, or he cannot see the Kingdom of God. Christ provides salvation (to be saved from the death sin brings, to the life of God's spirit) through the Atonement (or at-one-ment) of man with God. Christ became the mediator between sinful man and a righteous God. (John 3:3, K.J.V.and I Timothy 2:5). This new birth (born again) experience is uniquely Christian. When man repents (asks for forgiveness) from his sins, and accepts Christ as Savior, God hears his prayer and sends His Holy Spirit into man's heart, changing him forever. It cannot be experienced intellectually only. It is a spiritual experience only true born-again believers in Christ can know. The sorrow for sin must be deeply felt and totally sincere before the miracle of the New Birth can take place. The person who is born again has the witness of God's Spirit in him -- "The one who believes in the Son of God has the witness in himself" (I John 5:10). "The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God" (Romans 8:16). The Christian believes because he experiences the indwelling of Christ's Spirit within his heart, strengthening his resolve to walk with God, by God's grace (love) and help. The Christian Bible explains this changed life: "For whoever is born of God overcomes the world; and this is the victory that has overcome the world--our faith" (I John 5:4). "Therefore, if any man is in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold all things are become new" (II Corinthians 5:17, K.J.V.). This is the Christian experience of the "new birth," or the "born-again" experience. It is not thoroughly understood by anyone who has not experienced it. This is one major reason Christians are not understood by unregenerate persons in society. It is a burden Christians must bear as the central tenet of their faith, for it cannot be adequately explained, except through experience. The Church is the place Christians gather to study God's Word (the Bible) and know His will for their lives. The church is the meeting place -- the assembly of like people. America has 235,000 Christian churches. The Bible clearly instructs believers to meet: "Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching" (Hebrews 10:25, K.J.V.). The Christian faith and culture teaches that the Lord Jesus Christ will return for all those who have accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior. The Lord Himself will descend (as He ascended) in His second coming, and the Christians will rise to meet Him in the air; all those who died in the faith will be resurrected first, then those who are alive. All believers will live with Christ in heaven forever (eternity) in joy and perfect happiness; with new bodies, no illness, no sorrow!
Part II - The Christian Religion -
History and Culture
(The Bible, God, Jesus Christ, Old Testament and New Testament)
Section 5 - The Christian Impact on Society
The Biblical Principles on Social Issues have had the largest impact on the American culture as it has evolved from the Christian culture. The issues of 1.) sexual behavior; 2.) families and marriage; 3.) benevolence (kindness, generosity) to the poor, the sick and disabled; 4.) the sanctity of human life issues such as, abortion, euthanasia, hunger and disease; 5.) the resolution of conflicts in the family, the church, the state and the nations of the world, whose solutions are all part of the Christian culture and the American victories in solving many of man's oldest problems.Just as the first 123 universities and American colleges were founded by the Christian church to propagate the Christian religion and provide all people education in all the intellectual (math, science, history, religion, etc.) disciplines; as were most of the major hospitals in America founded as Christian hospitals. Libraries, publishing companies and many other institutions were founded by Christian denominations for public health, education and safety. The funding of these institutions was done privately, through church members' voluntary offerings, without any government or tax funding involved. This cultural practice continues in America today, with some of the largest foundations in the nation being Christian benevolent funding sources, to meet the needs of America's people in the physical, emotional, educational, social and spiritual realms of mankind's existence. (For one example, the Salvation Army). A brief description of these issues that form a cultural impact on all society is directly related to and taken from the biblical doctrines that form the Christian world view. The following is a description of some of the basic world views of the biblical Christian culture. There are many religions in the world and therefore many viewpoints (or world views). In the American culture, it is generally regarded that there are two competing world views, the Christian world view and the secular (non-believer) world view.
Part II - The Christian Religion -
History and Culture
(The Bible, God, Jesus Christ, Old Testament and New Testament)
Section 6 - The Christian World View vs.
The Secular World View
The secular viewpoint is represented by the Secular Humanist world view, (as indicated in the Humanist Manifesto I & II, 1941 and 1973) while the Christian viewpoint is represented by the Word of God -- the BIBLE. The following will illustrate the Christian culture as it contrasts with the secular humanist viewpoints, a non-theist system of beliefs, each philosophy creating a society often with a completely opposite culture and a different system of ethical standards to live by.
Contrasting Belief Systems Which Illustrate How Different Cultures Come to Exist
In Summary - The Contrast
To further contrast the religious beliefs of the Christian faith, with that of the secular faith, we can observe the Christian as well as Jewish and Muslim belief in God as Creator of all things -- The Theist creation system -- as it contrasts with that of the secular (humanist) view -- the Naturalist creation concept (a naturalist is one who believes that nature is all there is, i.e. "the cosmos is all there is ore ever was, or ever will be," Carl Sagan.) The first three opposing views are based on philosophical assumptions, not on scientific evidence. It is necessarily important that these philosophical assumptions be made explicit and not hidden for fruitful discussion to take place.
To be scientific, a word must be defined and used with consistency of meaning. Unfortunately, the meaning of the word "evolution" varies from the innocuous, "the change in living organisms over time" (Biology Living Systems, Raymond Oram, Glencoe, 1994, p. 936) to the philosophic view that life forms originated by chance, using random, naturalistic processes without plan or purpose [e.g. "evolution works without either plan or purpose . . . Evolution is random and undirected" (Biology, Miller and Levine, Prentice Hall, 1995, p. 658)]. To avoid confusion and teach the methods of objective scientific inquiry, it is recommended that instead of evolution without qualification, teachers use: Micro-evolution: "Evolution at and below the species level" (Mayr 1991). Generally refers to relatively minor variations that occur in populations over time. Macro-evolution: "Evolution above the species level; the evolution of higher taxa and the production of evolutionary novelties such as new structures" (Mayr 1991). Generally refers to major innovations such as new organs, structures or body plans. Darwinism (Neo-Darwinism, Evolutionism, Blind Watchmaker Thesis): The belief that undirected mechanistic processes (primarily random mutations and natural selection), account for both micro-evolution and macro-evolution, and thus for all the diverse and complex living organisms that exist. Common Descent: The theory that all organisms have been linked in the past by common ancestors. Mayr, Ernst. One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).
The Christian view believes in on God, Creator of all things. The Christian culture also believes in tolerance of all viewpoints on all areas of life and learning.
The Christian views FREE CHOICE for all men as an inalienable right for all. Liberty is a foundational belief in the Christian culture.
The Christian culture teaches that God's laws and commandments are not restrictive of freedom and happiness but are, in fact, the only way to achieve true freedom and happiness. The Christian in the Christian culture knows who they are; where they came from; and where they are going (by their own choice).
God's plan for human fulfillment in this life and in God's plan for mankind's life to come, is a proven plan, in hundreds of millions of Christian lives.
The Golden Rule that Jesus taught was to "treat others as you want them to treat you" (Luke 6:31, L.B.). All Christians are taught to practice this in their daily lives. This one teaching, alone, has a dramatic effect on an entire culture of people.
The Christian culture is a Christ-centered commitment to be true servants to others. It was estimated that 85% of all "volunteer" work (freely given) in the U.S. in 1996 was done by churches and individual Christians. The basis for this untiring effort within the Christian community is Jesus Christ's teaching: "Anyone wanting to be a leader among you must be your servant. And if you want to be right at the top, you must serve like a slave" (Matthew 20:26,27, L.B.).
True Christianity is service. Jesus said that religion, undefiled, is to help the orphans and widows. Always serving, is the Christian credo; others-centered, not self-centered. While the opposite is true on non-belief cultures, who teach self importance, self-esteem; the self over others.
The Christian Bible speaks of "absolute" truth, that is unchanging, but true in all situations. This is the basis for the Christian culture, as "Jesus Christ the same yesterday and today and forever." (Hebrew 13:8, K.J.V.)
The cultures of unbelief in God believe all truth is relevant and changing in every situation, without any ultimate truth or knowledge. They believe in situation ethics -- "what is moral to one may not be moral to another, it all depends on the situation." That belief is a very great contrast to Christian belief and culture, which accepts the Bible as its guide and as absolute truth, that everything else may be measured by the Bible truths.
The Christian culture relies on objectivity. That is, an objective approach, relying on the facts of history, facts of human experience (proven), and even more so, all the facts can be measured by the Christian benchmark -- the Bible. A benchmark is a starting point to measure all true reality. While Christianity deals with the 'subjective' in experiential knowledge, in a person's personal relation to Christ and the work of God's spirit, it always weighs the subjective (experience of his or her life by the 'objective' facts of TRUTH and the proven revelation found in the Bible. It must measure up to the Bible to be true Christianity.
The impact of the Christian philosophy (called Theology -- or a study of the teachings of God) on our culture is profound. While the culture of unbelief (secular) relies upon man's philosophy (man's ideas about life); two cultures, two philosophies -- man must "choose you this day whom ye will serve" -- according to the biblical religion (Joshua 24:15, K.J.V.). Christians believe that this choice will determine a person's happiness and fulfillment n this life and eternal joy in eternity; or to choose not to serve and believe God will result in doubt and unhappiness during our lifetime, and result in total separation from God and His love, for all eternity. This is known as the doctrine of heaven and hell in the Christian religion. It is God's will that all know of His system of rewards for those who love and have fellowship with Him; and His punishment for those who reject God and His Son, Jesus Christ, for the sinful pleasures of this world. Those are Christian cultural beliefs.
Part III - Teaching Multiculturalism -- Some Do's and Don'ts
A Background How to teach `multiculturalism' is a matter of great debate in
educational circles. Definitions of what "multicultural
education" really is widely differ, but in some form most schools
have experienced it. The movement's popularity prompted the National Association of
State Boards of Education (NASBE) to publish a 31-page report
called, " the American Tapestry: Educating a Nation, a Guide to
Infusing Multiculturalism into American Education." The document
offers nine recommendations for replacing the existing "Eurocentric"
slant in curriculum with a more ethnically diverse viewpoint. It is true that this nation is made up of peoples of diverse
nationalities and cultural heritages. Children should be knowledgeable
of the world's cultures and differences. The key to determining whether
multicultural education will have a positive or negative impact upon
students and society is to look at the perspective from which it is
taught, and the motivating purpose of those designing the multicultural
program -- in essence, how it is defined. America has long been made up of people from different races and
cultures -- that is not new. Public schools have traditionally played a
great role in helping to integrate this diversity into one American
culture. While it is true that most of those who initially shaped
this country were Anglo-Saxon, most non-Anglos accept the essence of the
ideas this country was founded upon -- many have, in fact, migrated to
America because of those ideals. There are now some people who would like to use that diversity to
change American culture. There is an attempt to create an America of
nationalities rather than a nation of Americans. Reality dictates that
teachers avoid doing this. Approaches to Multiculturalism There are basically two approaches to multicultural education.
Both recognize the need for sensitivity, empathy, understanding,
tolerance and appreciation -- a laudable goal for humanity. A regressive approach is one that looks to the past and
elicits students, through psychological techniques, to feel certain
emotions. The students feel a sense of guilt over past injustices and
are led to question the integrity of the founding fathers and American
national leaders. This negativity leads to accomplishing the
goal. Another approach is one that's visionary. By learning
principles of morality, justice, fairness and truth, and examining both
examples of people in the past who fell short of those ideals and others
who upheld those principles, students can achieve the goal and set
standards for their own future behavior. In this realistic model,
students become aware of human failings but also find positive role
models in those citizens who measure up to moral principles. This positive
approach helps students more closely align with reasonable standards of
morality. Just as failings in American history are included (i.e. slavery), so
should be the failures of other countries (i.e. the result of an
atheistic, communist system in the former USSR). The outstanding
qualities of the American system should also be emphasized.
Unfortunately, some multicultural classes show only America's problems,
not a balance. This leads to a negative view of citizenship and eventual
disintegration of society. Unity or Division? Sandra Stotsky, Director of the Institute on Writing, Reading and
Civic Education at Harvard University, writes, "On the one hand,
multicultural curricula can offer students a balanced appreciation and
critique of other cultures as well as our own; on the other, such
curricula can fall prey to political ideologies -- to `politically
correct thinking' or `radical multiculturalism.'" Ms. Stotsky continues, "Ideological multiculturalism sees the United States not as a
melting pot where individuals from all nations join together to become
Americans but as a nation of inviolable ethnic and racial groups.
Rather than uniting, it divides. Disintegration and divisiveness are
its goals, not integration, a sense of national community, or a
positive sense of social responsibility. Ultimately it champions group
rights over individual rights and would classify all Americans
permanently according to racial and ethnic criteria." Creating divisiveness is a very real danger in multicultural
education. In an attempt to use literature written from a certain
culture's perspective, schools may actually use materials that
inappropriately denigrate another culture or create hatred toward other
races. This creates divisiveness. So does any teaching that emphasizes,
"Your race was discriminated against in the past, therefore society
owes you." These types of teaching lead to situations like the Los
Angeles Riots, where racial groups were violently pitted against one
another. As President Theodore Roosevelt aptly stated, "The one
absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing
all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to
permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities." Rather than promoting diversity, a good multicultural program
will help students to understand and overcome diversity.
Multiculturalism should promote unity as Americans. Re-Writing History Many people argue that multiculturalism is used to force students to
conform to "politically correct" ideas, or to alter history to
make it more "politically acceptable." Ed Koch, former mayor
of New York City, was quoted in the New York Post (reprinted in Reader's
Digest, February 1992) as saying: "There is currently a fire storm raging in this country
regarding the way we teach our kids history. The result: a call for a
new multiculturalism that seeks to rewrite history. "It is fatuous to seek to convey that every group around the
world at every stage significantly contributed to the creation of
America. For example, I regret to say there were no Jews on the
Mayflower. But a fact is a fact. "Many groups have contributed to the fabric that is America.
However, the reality is the early settlers were Europeans, and
Americans share a common heritage that is based on our English and
European roots. "Should we be rewriting history just to make people feel good?
That's not history: that's psychiatry." To Accept and Respect? Multiculturalism education can be very destructive if it attempts to
rewrite history or if its intent is to change moral values or create a
moral diversity. Doing so would break the moral fabric that holds
society together and sustains law and order. Albert Shanker, former President of the American Federation of
Teachers, expounds upon the idea: "It's important that we teach our children about each other's
and other people's customs and values. We are unlikely to survive if
we don't. But this does not mean teaching students that they need not
hold other people's practices -- and their own -- up to moral
scrutiny. If we do this, we confuse objectivity with neutrality." In his article, "The Pitfalls of Multicultural Education,"
Mr. Shanker takes issue with a goal of the New York State Regents that
"Each student will develop the ability to understand, respect and
accept people of different races; sex; cultural heritage; national
origin; religion; and political, economic, and social background, and their
values, beliefs and attitudes." Mr. Shanker of the American Federation of Teachers questions some
practices: "But do we really want them to `respect and accept' the
`values, beliefs, and attitudes' of other people, no matter what they
are? "Do we want them to respect and accept the beliefs that led
Chinese leaders to massacre dissenting students in Tiananmen Square? .
. . Is exposing unwanted children to the elements and certain death, a
custom still widely practiced in some countries in Asia and Africa, to
be respected because it is part of somebody else's culture? . . . Must
we respect the custom of forcing young children in the Philippines or
Thailand to work in conditions of virtual slavery? And must we look
respectfully on Hitler's beliefs and actions?" Asking students to understand other viewpoints is an academic
pursuit which will enable them to become informed decision-makers.
Asking students to accept other viewpoints is pushing an ideological
agenda to turn them into politically correct morons that believe they
must accept and tolerate any behavior or belief, and thus accept that
there is no right and wrong, no morality. They will become unable to
take a conscientious stand on any issue. This nation could then
gradually disintegrate. Special Interests Riding the coat tails of legitimate multicultural concerns are
special interest groups looking for special treatment. The most
prominent of these to emerge so far is the homosexual lobby which, using
flawed statistics based on Kinsey's studies, is attempting to recruit
students and provide them with special services, at taxpayers' expense. In an effort to help "sexually diverse" students cope,
homosexual speakers are openly recruiting students in the classroom,
informing the students that ten percent of them are gay and must learn
to accept that they can't change that "fact." Parents object
to this, strongly. It is not a fact and therefore extremely harmful. Students are often provided with "hot line" numbers to
homosexual clubs that offer counseling. Such counseling services are
also being offered right on campus at some schools. All students in
these "PROJECT 10" classes are pressured into accepting
homosexuality as a normal alternative life-style, even if it violates
their religious beliefs or moral values, and homosexual students are
being given special treatment (for example, in Los Angeles, California,
they are given a separate high school). Reasonable people agree that no one should be discriminated
against because of their beliefs, including their sexual behaviors
(unless they are violating the law, in which case they are prosecuted).
But the homosexual special interest is attempting to get special
advantages. A good multicultural program is fair to all, without
discriminating against the majority by offering special privileges to
any minority. All teachers should stand strong for fairness, not
discrimination. Striking a Balance The American Federation of Teachers' 1990 resolution on
multiculturalism offers a balanced viewpoint that allows for appropriate
multicultural representation and understanding, yet emphasizes America's
roots and ideals. An excerpt follows: As a multicultural people, we are also, however, a single nation
bonded by a common set of democratic principles, individual rights and
moral values. To understand and defend the very principles and
institutions that provide our society its common aspirations, and
allow us in our multicultural society to live together in relative
peace -- as compared to the constant warfare that tears apart so many
other non-homogeneous societies -- our children need an education in
the humanities that imparts to them the values of tolerance, freedom,
equality, pluralism and common human dignity. This also is part of a
multicultural education; and while such values and principles can be
conveyed using ideas and documents from a range of cultures, such an
education also requires, unavoidably, a special emphasis on the
history and legacies of those societies that have been most important
in developing democratic ideals and practices. Sandra Stotsky of Harvard University, quoted earlier, concluded:
"The vast majority of parents in this country still want their
children to value American citizenship and a representative form of
self-government based on individual rights and responsibilities. To
survive, public schools must fulfill their essential civic role -- the
development of those common values that make all our children
responsible American citizens, whatever else they may be." A Brief Review of Do's and Don'ts of
Multicultural Teaching 1. Whether the subject being covered is religion or social issues, a
teacher should try not to make any student or group of students
uncomfortable, regard- less of their religion or ethnicity. 2. Never criticize another ethnic, national or cultural group. It's
okay to compare two (2) groups on certain things, but only objectively,
without personal opinions. If a student is still uncomfortable after your best effort, try to
isolate the reason and (without singling out that student) discuss how
to be tolerant and to "treat others as you want them to treat
you." That is the "Golden Rule." 3. Do support the American culture, whether you agree with it or not,
on all points. Do not use "diversity" to attempt to change
American culture. 4. Be objective, even if you feel strongly against something. The
best test is to do a section on Islam, if you are a Christian. Can you
do it? Can you still be objective? Every teacher must be able to answer
yes to those questions. 5. Do not let past injustices to one religion or race (i.e. slavery)
be imputed to another race in a way to make a group of students feel
they are guilty for what was done 200 years ago. Show America's positive
side also. Anyone unable to do this can contribute to the eventual
disintegration of society, producing a nation of `races,' creating
racial wars that could destroy our society. Other countries' failings
should also be pointed out alongside their assets. 6. Do not emphasize `diversity' -- although we have much of it
-- but emphasize unity, and the power to overcome diversity. 7. Portray history accurately. Do not try to re-write history to fit
your own ideology, wishes or moral values (or lack of). 8. Present a study of others' beliefs, values and attitudes for
understanding, but do not try to have students respect or accept those
beliefs or values, contrary to their parents or their own culture. 9. To impress innocent and immature students with counter-cultural
values to the degree of accepting others' values in the name of
tolerance and diversity is clearly unacceptable. Critical thinking
skills must be emphasized. 10. Avoid special interest ideology battles. The most divisive
element, still, between schools and parents is how to handle the
homosexual lobby and their different moral issues. Asking students to
accept homosexuality as a normal `alternate' life-style, is like raising
a red flag to parents. That is totally a violation of the American
Christian cultural beliefs as well as the law. Conclusion: Every school district should have a clear district policy on teaching
multiculturalism, such as the one listed in the opening of these
teachers guidelines. Teachers should keep the time spent on various cultural and religious
beliefs equal to the proportionate representation in American society at
large. American/Christian culture is obviously dominant with more than
80% of the population. Currently, one survey done by parents found that only
5% of the multicultural courses even mentioned the American
culture. We should maintain equality among speakers of other
cultures, but equal time must be allowed for opponents. No speakers
should recruit students to their culture, belief or life-style. Accuracy
and academic integrity must prevail in all multicultural teaching.
Western values should be held up and respected. Experience has shown that the most effective multicultural courses
are best taught as part of existing subject matter, such as social
studies, history, literature, language and geography. The California
guidelines, as well as others indicate these subject areas are best
for teaching religion and cultures. Note: Your suggestions are invited in all areas, pro or con. Robert L. Simonds, Th.D.
|